Knowledge and the Problem of Logical Omniscience
نویسنده
چکیده
The notion of knowledge has recently acquired a great deal of importance in Computer Science, partly because of its importance in AI and expert systems, but also because of applications in distributed computing and possible, even likely relevance to cryptography. See [H2] for a representative collection of papers on knowledge. An important outstanding problem in the logic of knowledge is the problem of logical omniscience, which plagues all the current logics of knowledge that are founded on the notion of a possible world. We assume in these logics the notion of a world, or situation which is possible relative to an individual (knower) i. The individual i knows a fact B iff B is true in all the worlds which are possible for i. It follows that if i knows A and also knows A → B, then both A and A → B are true at all worlds possible for i and hence B is true at all the worlds possible for i so that i knows B. In particular, i knows all B which are logically valid. This principle, the principle of logical omniscience, is usually expressed as the formula
منابع مشابه
Dealing With Logical Omniscience: Expressiveness and Pragmatics
We examine four approaches for dealing with the logical omniscience problem and their potential applicability: the syntactic approach, awareness, algorithmic knowledge, and impossible possible worlds. Although in some settings these approaches are equiexpressive and can capture all epistemic states, in other settings of interest (especially with probability in the picture), we show that they ar...
متن کاملKnowledge, Logical Omniscience, and Resource-bounded Reasoning
Agent theories typically use modal epistemic logic for modeling knowledge of agents. Since the modal approach to epistemic logic cannot formalize resource-bounded reasoning adequately, it it not suited to describe realistic, implementable agents. We develop a framework for solving that problem. We introduce the notion of algorithmic knowledge — a concept that establishes a direct link between a...
متن کاملOn Epistemic Logic and Logical Omniscience
We consider the logical omniscience problem of epistemic logic. We argue that the problem is due to the way in which knowledge and belief are captured in Hintikka's possible worlds semantics. We describe an alternative approach in which propositions are sets of worlds, and knowledge and belief are simply a list of propositions for each agent. The problem of the circularity in the definition is ...
متن کاملLogics for resource-bounded agents
In this thesis, I criticise traditional epistemic logics based on possible worlds semantics, inspired by Hintikka, as a framework for representing the beliefs and knowledge of agents. The traditional approach suffers from the logical omniscience problem: agents are modelled as knowing all consequences of their knowledge, which is not an admissible assumption when modelling real-world reasoning ...
متن کاملLogical omniscience and common knowledge: WHAT do we know and what do WE know?
Two difficult issues for the logic of knowledge have been logical omniscience and common knowledge. Our existing logics of knowledge based on Kripke structures seem to justify logical omniscience, but we know that in real life it does not exist. Also, common knowledge appears to be needed for certain real life procedures to work. But it seems quite implausible that it actually exists in real pe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1987